From: Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@xdin•com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber•org>
Cc: "netdev@vger•kernel.org" <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches•com>,
Javier Boticario <jboticario@gmail•com>,
"balferreira@googlemail•com" <balferreira@googlemail•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/hsr: Add support for the High-availability Seamless Redundancy protocol (HSRv0)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:30:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CA1A1B.5080700@xdin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130624170727.4d7893a1@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
On 2013-06-25 02:07, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:44:01 -0700
> Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@xdin•com> wrote:
>
>> +
>> +
>> +static bool is_admin_up(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return dev && (dev->flags & IFF_UP);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_operstate_up(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return (dev && (dev->operstate == IF_OPER_UP));
>> +}
>> +
>
> Isn't is_admin_up the same as netif_running()?
I don't think so (but I'm unsure). This is netif_running() (from include/linux/netdevice.h):
static inline bool netif_running(const struct net_device *dev)
{
return test_bit(__LINK_STATE_START, &dev->state);
}
I'm not sure what this does. I don't think it's the same as checking whether the admin has
issued an UP command?
> And is_operstate_up the same as netif_oper_up()?
netif_oper_up() also returns true if the device state is IF_OPER_UNKNOWN. A device can
have that state without even having carrier, so that's not OK for the HSR driver.
--
Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux)
T: +46-8-56254286 | M: +46-70-9714286 | arvid.brodin@xdin•com
XDIN AB | Knarrarnäsgatan 7 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden | xdin.com
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1902752B0C92F943AB7EA9EE13E2DEEC126CC8C873@HQ1-EXCH02.corp.brocade.com>
[not found] ` <20130624170727.4d7893a1@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
2013-06-25 22:30 ` Arvid Brodin [this message]
2013-06-25 22:46 ` [PATCH] net/hsr: Add support for the High-availability Seamless Redundancy protocol (HSRv0) Stephen Hemminger
2013-06-25 23:36 ` Arvid Brodin
[not found] ` <20130624171151.7b2b342a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
2013-06-25 22:57 ` Arvid Brodin
2013-06-24 16:43 Arvid Brodin
2013-06-24 18:16 ` Joe Perches
2013-06-25 21:16 ` Arvid Brodin
2013-06-25 21:31 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CA1A1B.5080700@xdin.com \
--to=arvid.brodin@xdin$(echo .)com \
--cc=balferreira@googlemail$(echo .)com \
--cc=jboticario@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=joe@perches$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox