Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:net:hamradio: Removing Depricated IRQF_DISABLED

From: Kumar Gaurav <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 22:32:04 +0530

On Saturday 10 August 2013 10:17 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> If it is in a | with something else, I think you can just remove it.
>
> julia
>
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
>
>> Removed IRQF_DISABLED as it's deprecated and should be removed
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c |    2 +-
>>   drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c |    2 +-
>>   drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c            |    2 +-
>>   drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c            |    2 +-
>>   4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c
>> index a974727..c114009 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c
>> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static int ser12_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>   	outb(0, FCR(dev->base_addr));  /* disable FIFOs */
>>   	outb(0x0d, MCR(dev->base_addr));
>>   	outb(0, IER(dev->base_addr));
>> -	if (request_irq(dev->irq, ser12_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
>> +	if (request_irq(dev->irq, ser12_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE | IRQF_SHARED,
>>   			"baycom_ser_fdx", dev)) {
>>   		release_region(dev->base_addr, SER12_EXTENT);
>>   		return -EBUSY;
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c
>> index e349d86..d91c1fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c
>> @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int ser12_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>   	outb(0, FCR(dev->base_addr));  /* disable FIFOs */
>>   	outb(0x0d, MCR(dev->base_addr));
>>   	outb(0, IER(dev->base_addr));
>> -	if (request_irq(dev->irq, ser12_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
>> +	if (request_irq(dev->irq, ser12_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE | IRQF_SHARED,
>>   			"baycom_ser12", dev)) {
>>   		release_region(dev->base_addr, SER12_EXTENT);
>>   		return -EBUSY;
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c
>> index bc1d521..4bc6ee8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c
>> @@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ static int scc_net_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
>>   			if (!Ivec[hwcfg.irq].used && hwcfg.irq)
>>   			{
>>   				if (request_irq(hwcfg.irq, scc_isr,
>> -						IRQF_DISABLED, "AX.25 SCC",
>> +						0, "AX.25 SCC",
>>   						(void *)(long) hwcfg.irq))
>>   					printk(KERN_WARNING "z8530drv: warning, cannot get IRQ %d\n", hwcfg.irq);
>>   				else
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
>> index 0721e72..f947887 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
>> @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ static int yam_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>   		goto out_release_base;
>>   	}
>>   	outb(0, IER(dev->base_addr));
>> -	if (request_irq(dev->irq, yam_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev)) {
>> +	if (request_irq(dev->irq, yam_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE | IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev)) {
>>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq %d busy\n", dev->name, dev->irq);
>>   		ret = -EBUSY;
>>   		goto out_release_base;
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to [email-masked]
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
Yes i was suggested for using IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE too so used this. Please 
tell me if this makes any difference or issue?

Regards
Kumar Gaurav