Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net/cadence/macb: add support for dt phy definition

From: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:16:42 +0200

On 27/08/2013 11:13, boris brezillon :
> On 27/08/2013 11:07, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hello Boris,
>>
>> 2013/8/27 boris brezillon <[email-masked]>:
>>> Hello Dave,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26/08/2013 22:04, David Miller wrote:
>>>> From: Boris BREZILLON <[email-masked]>
>>>> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:56:20 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> This patch series adds support for ethernet phy definition using device
>>>>> tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> This may help in moving some at91 boards to dt (some of them define an
>>>>> interrupt pin).
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on samad31ek.
>>>> Series applied to net-next, thanks.
>>> Could you apply, the 3rd version of this series instead ?
>>>
>>> It fixes one bug when no phy is discovered and use the appropriate address
>>> for the phy dt node.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>> You will probably have to resubmit an incremental patch, I have never
>> seen David pick up another version of a patch once it has been pushed
>> out:
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=8c038e7e14b1c5f156745e3c4df0a3aa46173dd9
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=148cbb53ace32f584d208764c7f7e6aa8edb970c
> Okay, I will submit patches (based on net-next branch) to fix those bugs.

You can add my Acked-by to your fixes...

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre