From: annie li <annie.li@oracle•com>
To: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix•com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists•xen.org, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix•com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix•com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: fix fragment detection in checksum setup
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:35:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529827BC.8050207@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385645032-29848-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com>
On 2013/11/28 21:23, Paul Durrant wrote:
> The code to detect fragments in checksum_setup() was missing for IPv4 and
> too eager for IPv6. (It transpires that Windows seems to send IPv6 packets
> with a fragment header even if they are not a fragment - i.e. offset is zero,
> and M bit is not set).
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix•com>
> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix•com>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix•com>
> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix•com>
> ---
> v2
>
> - Added comments noting what fragment/offset masks mean
>
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 919b650..c7464d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -1165,15 +1165,28 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct iphdr *iph = (void *)skb->data;
> unsigned int header_size;
> unsigned int off;
> + bool fragment;
> int err = -EPROTO;
>
> + fragment = false;
Is it better to initialize fragment directly as following?
bool fragment = false;
> +
> off = sizeof(struct iphdr);
>
> header_size = skb->network_header + off + MAX_IPOPTLEN;
> maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
>
> + /* 3fff -> fragment offset != 0 OR more fragments */
> + if (ntohs(iph->frag_off) & 0x3fff)
> + fragment = true;
> +
> off = iph->ihl * 4;
>
> + if (fragment) {
> + if (net_ratelimit())
> + netdev_err(vif->dev, "Packet is a fragment!\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> switch (iph->protocol) {
> case IPPROTO_TCP:
> if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, off,
> @@ -1237,6 +1250,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
> bool fragment;
> bool done;
>
> + fragment = false;
> done = false;
Same as above for "done" and "fragment"...
Thanks
Annie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-29 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 13:23 [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: fix fragment detection in checksum setup Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 17:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-29 10:32 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-29 5:35 ` annie li [this message]
2013-11-29 9:10 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-29 9:57 ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529827BC.8050207@oracle.com \
--to=annie.li@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix$(echo .)com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix$(echo .)com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix$(echo .)com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists$(echo .)xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox