Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] batadv: Slight optimization of batadv_compare_eth

From: Antonio Quartulli <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:10:31 +0100

On 06/12/13 09:18, Joe Perches wrote:
> Use CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to check if this
> function can be optimized by using the generic ether_addr_equal.
> 
> Remove the unnecessary ?: after the unoptimized memcmp.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email-masked]>

Acked-by: Antonio Quartulli <[email-masked]>

- -- 
Antonio Quartulli