Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] bonding: add option lp_interval for loading module

From: Ding Tianhong <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:28:30 +0800

On 2013/12/21 10:06, Scott Feldman wrote:
> 
> On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Ding Tianhong <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
>> @@ -4271,6 +4276,12 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
>> 		fail_over_mac_value = BOND_FOM_NONE;
>> 	}
>>
>> +	if (lp_interval == 0) {
>> +		pr_warning("Warning: ip_interval must be between 1 and %d, so it was reset to %d\n",
>> +			INT_MAX, BOND_ALB_DEFAULT_LP_INTERVAL);
>> +		lp_interval = BOND_ALB_DEFAULT_LP_INTERVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> [sorry, replied with wrong email]
> 
> What do you think about using the new bond_option_xxx_set() functions for module parameters also?  The above code, for example, is duplicated in bond_option_lp_interval_set().  This way, we have a unified solution, where option bounds checking, compatibility, warnings, etc happened in one place for all three modes of input: sysfs, netlink, and module params.
> 
> -scott
> 

Yes, I agree with you, and I will wait for you to finish the bond_option_xxx_set() and then make the bond_check_params() use them, I think the code will be more simplify.
Thanks

Regards
ding 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to [email-masked]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
>