Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 06:58:32 -0500

On 12/23/13 19:41, Cong Wang wrote:

>
> Therefore should go to net rather than net-next?
>

I asked that question to Dave. Will let him call it.
This one sits on patches that are on top of net-next.

cheers,
jamal