Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC v2 0/6] introduce infrastructure for support of switch chip datapath

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:32:35 -0400

On 03/27/14 08:00, Thomas Graf wrote:

> It seems like we reached pretty good consensus on the model. What
> remaining issues do you see with the port model proposed in v2?
>

Are we really following the same thread?
I dont see any rallying behind Jiri's approach from the
other folks who have their own code and way of approaching things.
I am hoping we dont continue with the split that is there
already.

cheers,
jamal