public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chenweilong <chenweilong@huawei•com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>
Cc: <kaber@trash•net>, <davem@davemloft•net>,
	<netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind•com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] vlan: Don't allow vlan devices to change network namespaces.
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:40:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5357280C.1000404@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398176819.29946.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On 2014/4/22 22:26, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 20:43 +0800, Chen Weilong wrote:
>> From: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei•com>
>>
>> Like bonding, vlan as netdevice doesn't cross netns boundaries.
>>
>> Vlan port and vlan itself live in same netns.
> 
> Please explain why you believe it should be like that.
> 
> bonding and vlan have quite different purpose, so your changelog is
> quite obscure.
> 
> We had a discussion like this one with macvlan, and prior patch was
> rejected.
> 
> 
> 
> 
This idea comes from the different result of two changing namespace orders.
Test on eth1 and its vlan eth1.5, move them form default ns to a new ns called net0.
1.move eth1 first,and then eth1.5;
2.move eth1.5 first, and then eth1;
As a network manager, I will be happy they both work, I don't care about the orders.
But, 1) doesn't work, if eth1 was moved to other ns, all related vlans were unregisted.
you need to create a new eth1.5 in net0.
And, 2) is not safe, if someone forgets to move eth1, eth1.5 will not work, making
things complex.

So what's the better order ?
I prefer 1), when a vlan dev is setup, it has a namespace, and belongs to it,
When somebody moves it, it should say 'hey boy, don't move me,I like here :0'

Thanks,
Weilong

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-23  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-22 12:43 [patch net-next] vlan: Don't allow vlan devices to change network namespaces Chen Weilong
2014-04-22 12:54 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2014-04-22 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-04-23  2:40   ` chenweilong [this message]
2014-04-23  7:23     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2014-04-24  0:59       ` chenweilong
2014-04-24  5:47         ` Michal Kubecek
2014-04-24  7:01           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2014-04-24 11:32           ` chenweilong
2014-04-24 12:41             ` chenweilong
2014-04-24 13:21               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2014-04-25 10:23                 ` chenweilong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5357280C.1000404@huawei.com \
    --to=chenweilong@huawei$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kaber@trash$(echo .)net \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox