Subject: Re: [3.15-rc3] Bisected: xen-netback mangles packets between two guests on a bridge since merge of "TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy" series.

From: Zoltan Kiss <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 14:49:45 +0100

On 30/04/14 11:45, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>      Another point would be: what *correctness* testing is actually done on the xen-net* patches ?
I can speak only about my patches: I have manually tested them for the 
usecases where they likely to make a difference, plus they went through 
Xenserver's full test suite several times.
>      As i suspect this is again about fragmented packets .. that doesn't seem to be included in any test case while it actually seems to be a case which is hard to get right...
Beware, there are frags and frag_list which are two entirely different 
things with confusing names. In netback case, frags are used to pass 
through large packets for a long time. frag_list is used only since my 
grant mapping patches, to handle older guests (see comment in 
include/xen/interface/io/netif.h for XEN_NETIF_NR_SLOTS_MIN)

Zoli