public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix•com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix•com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix•com>
Cc: <netdev@vger•kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists•xen.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix•com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2 2/3] xen-netback: don't stop dealloc kthread too early
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:13:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E8CF95.5050209@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E8CBF5.1030600@citrix.com>

On 11/08/14 14:58, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 11/08/14 14:48, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:10:12PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 08/08/14 17:37, Wei Liu wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>   	if (tx_evtchn == rx_evtchn) {
>>>>   		/* feature-split-event-channels == 0 */
>>>> @@ -687,6 +700,9 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif)
>>>>   			queue->task = NULL;
>>>>   		}
>>>>   
>>>> +		wait_event(queue->inflight_wq,
>>>> +			   atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) == 0);
>>>
>>> Just make the dealloc task not stop unless it has deallocated all
>>> outstanding requests.  There's no need for another wait queue here.
>>>
>>
>> Are you suggesting something like
>>
>>    while (atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) !=0)
>>    	schedule_timeout(SOME_TIMEOUT);
> 
> No. That would be awful!
> 
> Add the test to the kthread itself:
> 
> int xenvif_dealloc_kthread(void *data)
> {
> 	struct xenvif_queue *queue = data;
> 
> 	while (atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) > 0
>                 || !kthread_should_stop()) {
>              [...]
> 
> etc.
> 
> Although, the main loop is a bit confused, so I suggest adding:
> 
> static bool xenvif_dealloc_thread_should_stop(struct xenvif_queue *q)
> {
>      /* Dealloc thread must remain running if there are any inflight
>       * packets so it can properly dealloc them when they complete.
>       */
>      return atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets) == 0
>          && kthread_should_stop();
> }
> 
> And cleaning it up a bit (the while() could be a for(;;)).

I would recommend this:
---
@@ -2066,7 +2066,7 @@ int xenvif_dealloc_kthread(void *data)
 		wait_event_interruptible(queue->dealloc_wq,
 					 tx_dealloc_work_todo(queue) ||
 					 kthread_should_stop());
-		if (kthread_should_stop())
+		if (kthread_should_stop() && !atomic_read(&queue->inflight_packets))
 			break;
 
 		xenvif_tx_dealloc_action(queue);
---
If kthread_stop called, this will keep the main loop running until all callbacks are called.
Then it proceeds to the exit branch, otherwise doesn't disrupt normal operation.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-11 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-08 16:37 [PATCH net v2 0/3] xen-netback: synchronisation between core driver and netback Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:37 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] xen-netback: move NAPI add/remove calls Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:49   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-08-08 16:52     ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 12:35   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-11 12:49     ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-11 13:01       ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 13:14         ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-11 13:43           ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 13:59             ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 14:08               ` Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:37 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] xen-netback: don't stop dealloc kthread too early Wei Liu
2014-08-11 12:10   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-11 13:48     ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 13:58       ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 14:13         ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2014-08-11 14:44           ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 15:23             ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 20:39               ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 14:31         ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 14:34           ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 14:39             ` Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:37 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] xen-netback: remove loop waiting function Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E8CF95.5050209@citrix.com \
    --to=zoltan.kiss@citrix$(echo .)com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix$(echo .)com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists$(echo .)xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox