Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 10/12] openvswitch: add support for datapath hardware offload

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs-jkUAjuhPggJWk0Htik3J/[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:29:10 -0400

On 08/26/14 11:22, Jiri Pirko wrote:

> I do not think that really matters. Phase one is flows. After that we
> can focus on l2/l3. If we would be able to fit in in flows (some drivers
> may), then ok. If not, we extend the api with couple of more l2/l3
> related ndos. I see no problem there.

Well, it matters because we are proceeding to implement L2/3.
i.e the simple stuff first. We dont have anything to show yet - but
we will hopefully have some useful bit by Plumbers.
So maybe best path forward is we talk then and see how we can merge
efforts since we cant seem to agree at this point.

cheers,
jamal