Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: bpf_jit_comp: simplify trivial boolean return

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:55:48 +0100

On 11/26/2014 05:58 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
...
>> imo existing code is fine and I don't think the time spent
>> reviewing such changes is worth it when there is no
>> improvement in readability.

+1

> Is there any value in reordering these tests for frequency
> or maybe using | instead of || to avoid multiple jumps?

No, it's not a fast-path.