From: Du Fan <fengyuleidian0615@gmail•com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen•de>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug•ch>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat•com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira•com>, Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat•com>,
"davem@davemloft•net" <davem@davemloft•net>,
pshelar@nicira•com, netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
"dev@openvswitch•org" <dev@openvswitch•org>,
"Du, Fan" <fan.du@intel•com>
Subject: [Discussion] About over-MTU-sized skb in virtualized env
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:39:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547EB029.5010102@gmail.com> (raw)
Sorry for resend this mail, because my company email is rejected by netdev.
Hi Florian
214 static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct sk_buff *skb)
215 {
216 netdev_features_t features;
217 struct sk_buff *segs;
218 int ret = 0;
219
220 /* common case: locally created skb or seglen is <= mtu */
221 if (((IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FORWARDED) == 0) ||
222 skb_gso_network_seglen(skb) <= ip_skb_dst_mtu(skb))
223 return ip_finish_output2(skb);
Could you please state _concrete_ reason why locally created skb
length is ＿always＿ fitting into MTU size? or why we needs this
checking.
Especially in below scenario:
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/figures/14/a/a/common/figures/under-the-hood-scenario-1-ovs-compute.png
As many people have discuss it in this thread:
http://marc.info/?t=141715669700004&r=1&w=2
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 6:39 Du Fan [this message]
2014-12-03 10:50 ` [Discussion] About over-MTU-sized skb in virtualized env Florian Westphal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-03 5:40 Du, Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=547EB029.5010102@gmail.com \
--to=fengyuleidian0615@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch$(echo .)org \
--cc=fan.du@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=fbl@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=fw@strlen$(echo .)de \
--cc=jesse@nicira$(echo .)com \
--cc=mst@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@nicira$(echo .)com \
--cc=tgraf@suug$(echo .)ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox