Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if ndo_fdb_dump is defined.

From: Roopa Prabhu <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:32:46 -0800

On 12/11/14, 9:06 AM, Hubert Sokolowski wrote:
> My apologies for sending again, I forgot to include a sample output you asked.
>
>> Also, if i hear your concern correctly, for bridge ports that implement
>> ndo_fdb_dump, with commit 5e6d243587990a588143b9da3974833649595587, we
>> will get two entries for each 'self' entry above.
>> Can you also paste sample output for that ?.
>>
> [root@silpixa00378825 ~]# bridge fdb show brport mac0
> 33:33:00:00:00:01 self permanent
> 33:33:00:00:00:01 self permanent
>
>
Thanks. yes, that is a problem. And, this mac0 is not a bridge port 
correct ?.

But, for the same test case, when mac0 is a bridge port, does your patch 
under review make both the entries go away for a bridge port ?.
(If i understand jamal correctly, this is his concern).