Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mark some potential candidates __read_mostly

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:11:36 +0100

On 01/29/2015 04:40 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
...
> Why not const?

Because all these candidates have a list member and are being
registered at respective places during __init/__exit. Similar
structs in other places already have __read_mostly, but these
ones can still be converted to it.

Cheers,
Daniel