Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation

From: "Fu, Zhonghui" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 19:56:38 +0800

On 2015/2/3 21:08, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Fu, Zhonghui" <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>> >From ff39ed4af9f1c50358fe92ec4c8eaac9db183e00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Zhonghui Fu <[email-masked]>
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:13:21 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation
>>
>> WiFi chip has 2 SDIO functions, and PM core will trigger
>> twice suspend/resume operations for one WiFi chip to do
>> the same things. This patch avoid this case.
>>
>> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel<[email-masked]>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <[email-masked]>
> This doesn't apply:
>
> Applying: brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation
> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
> Auto-merging drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> Failed to merge in the changes.
> Patch failed at 0001 brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation
>
> BTW, when you resend a patch please use "[PATCH v2]" (or v3, v4...) in
> the Subject field.
Just see your comments, so please ignore my inquiry in last mail. I will re-base this patch again.

Thanks,
Zhonghui