Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] rhashtable: better high order allocation attempts

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:23:18 +0100

On 02/20/2015 11:11 AM, David Laight wrote:
...
> How about a two-level array for large tables?
> Then you don't need to allocate more than 1 page at a time?

Sorry, I currently don't see how this fits into the rhashtable
algorithm i.e. with regards to the expansion and shrink logic?