Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] can: kvaser_usb: Use can-dev unregistration mechanism

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:55:11 +0100

On 03/14/2015 04:41 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 04:26:56PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 03/14/2015 02:11 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
>>> From: Ahmed S. Darwish <[email-masked]>
>>>
>>> Use can-dev's unregister_candev() instead of directly calling
>>> networking unregister_netdev(). While both are functionally
>>> equivalent, unregister_candev() might do extra stuff in the
>>> future than just calling networking layer unregistration code.
>>
>> Since 2 goes into can, I've applied this into can-next.

> Was this a cherry-pick? Because I was going to send a new
> series with patch #2 better worded, and with a new patch for
> the endiannes issue.

Yes, no need to resend patch #3, as it's already applied to can-next.

regards,
Marc

1 = can: kvaser_usb: Fix tx queue start/stop race conditions
2 = can: kvaser_usb: Utilize all possible tx URBs
3 = can: kvaser_usb: Use can-dev unregistration mechanism
4 = the endianess issue

1 = is in linux-can and included in linux-can-fixes-for-4.0-20150314
2 = will go into linux-can with a better commit message
    which is currently prepare by you
    will be in the next pull request for net
3 = is in linux-can-next and will be included in the next pull request
    for net-next
4 = is currently prepared by you
    will be in the next pull request for net

This means, you'll send me patches 2 and 4 in a new v5 series. (This
patches will of course have new numbers, 1 and 2.)

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |