public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public•gmane.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public•gmane.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public•gmane.org>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf-G/eBtMaohhA@public•gmane.org>,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public•gmane.org,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public•gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public•gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] bpf: allow extended BPF programs access skb fields
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 00:51:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5504C989.8000800@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550459E4.1050808-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

On 03/14/2015 04:55 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
...
> so from there I saw two options: either copy paste all
> build_bug_on and have the same *insn=... and build_bug_on in
> two places or consolidate them in single helper function.
> Obviously single helper function is a preferred method.
> I'm not sure what are you still arguing about.

I'm repeating myself here, but fair enough. To me the v1
code in sk_filter_convert_ctx_access() was more sound. So
taking out the ifindex issue, that's 4 BUILD_BUG_ON()s in
addition.

I actually think the current filter code is in a reasonable
shape. convert_bpf_extensions() is full of BPF to eBPF
conversions, so going over convert_bpf_extensions() some of
them would now use convert_skb_access(), some other ``skb
accesses''use macros directly in place, the reading-flow of
this code now is inconsistent to me and it would have been
more sound if that's just left as is in convert_bpf_extensions().

I'm all for consolidating code, don't get me wrong, but I
think this exception would be better for above sake. That's
all I'm trying to say. I understand you're of exact opposite
opinion, so I guess it's pointless for me to comment any
further on this.

Thanks,
Daniel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-14 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-13 18:57 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] bpf: allow eBPF access skb fields Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-13 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] bpf: allow extended BPF programs " Alexei Starovoitov
     [not found]   ` <1426273064-4837-2-git-send-email-ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14  1:46     ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]       ` <550392F7.9040308-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14  2:06         ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-14  2:08           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  2:16             ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]               ` <55039A0D.20000-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14  2:27                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  4:59                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  9:35                     ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]                       ` <550400D8.5060407-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14 15:55                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
     [not found]                           ` <550459E4.1050808-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14 23:51                             ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-03-15  2:02                               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  2:07       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-13 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] samples: bpf: add skb->field examples and tests Alexei Starovoitov
     [not found] ` <1426273064-4837-1-git-send-email-ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-16  2:03   ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] bpf: allow eBPF access skb fields David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5504C989.8000800@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel-fec+5ew28dpmcu3hniyyjq@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=tgraf-G/eBtMaohhA@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox