public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems•com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat•com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel•com>,
	davem@davemloft•net
Cc: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel•com>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, nhorman@redhat•com, sassmann@redhat•com,
	jogreene@redhat•com
Subject: Re: [net-next 05/16] ixgbevf: enable multiple queue support
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:49:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55131153.2090401@cloudius-systems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5512FEDC.7080902@redhat.com>



On 03/25/15 20:30, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 03/25/2015 01:44 AM, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/05/15 11:35, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>>> From: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel•com>
>>>
>>> This patch enables multiple queues and RSS support for the VF.
>>> Maximum of 2 queues are supported due to available vectors.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel•com>
>>> Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <Krishneil.k.singh@intel•com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel•com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      |  1 +
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 22 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++---
>>>   2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h 
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h
>>> index 8c44ab2..65cda34 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h
>>> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct ixgbevf_ring {
>>>     #define MAX_RX_QUEUES IXGBE_VF_MAX_RX_QUEUES
>>>   #define MAX_TX_QUEUES IXGBE_VF_MAX_TX_QUEUES
>>> +#define IXGBEVF_MAX_RSS_QUEUES 2
>>
>> According to the MRQE register description in 82599 and x540 specs 2 
>> (the value of IXGBEVF_MAX_RSS_QUEUES) is the minimal allowed number 
>> of queues in a single pool thus it's a minimal number of VF queues - 
>> not the maximal (see more comments on this below).
>
> This is the maximum since the VF only supports 3 interrupts, one for 
> mailbox and 2 for queues, and RSS requires an interrupt per queue 
> pair.  The other possibility is that DCB has been enabled in which 
> case there RSS is reduced to one queue pair per pool with one RSS pool 
> for each traffic class.
>
>>
>>>     #define IXGBEVF_DEFAULT_TXD   1024
>>>   #define IXGBEVF_DEFAULT_RXD   512
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c 
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
>>> index c9b49bf..815808f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
>>> @@ -1794,7 +1794,8 @@ static int ixgbevf_configure_dcb(struct 
>>> ixgbevf_adapter *adapter)
>>>       struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>>>       unsigned int def_q = 0;
>>>       unsigned int num_tcs = 0;
>>> -    unsigned int num_rx_queues = 1;
>>> +    unsigned int num_rx_queues = adapter->num_rx_queues;
>>> +    unsigned int num_tx_queues = adapter->num_tx_queues;
>>>       int err;
>>>         spin_lock_bh(&adapter->mbx_lock);
>>> @@ -1808,6 +1809,9 @@ static int ixgbevf_configure_dcb(struct 
>>> ixgbevf_adapter *adapter)
>>>           return err;
>>>         if (num_tcs > 1) {
>>> +        /* we need only one Tx queue */
>>> +        num_tx_queues = 1;
>>> +
>>>           /* update default Tx ring register index */
>>>           adapter->tx_ring[0]->reg_idx = def_q;
>>>   @@ -1816,7 +1820,8 @@ static int ixgbevf_configure_dcb(struct 
>>> ixgbevf_adapter *adapter)
>>>       }
>>>         /* if we have a bad config abort request queue reset */
>>> -    if (adapter->num_rx_queues != num_rx_queues) {
>>> +    if ((adapter->num_rx_queues != num_rx_queues) ||
>>> +        (adapter->num_tx_queues != num_tx_queues)) {
>>>           /* force mailbox timeout to prevent further messages */
>>>           hw->mbx.timeout = 0;
>>>   @@ -2181,8 +2186,19 @@ static void ixgbevf_set_num_queues(struct 
>>> ixgbevf_adapter *adapter)
>>>           return;
>>>         /* we need as many queues as traffic classes */
>>> -    if (num_tcs > 1)
>>> +    if (num_tcs > 1) {
>>>           adapter->num_rx_queues = num_tcs;
>>> +    } else {
>>> +        u16 rss = min_t(u16, num_online_cpus(), 
>>> IXGBEVF_MAX_RSS_QUEUES);
>>
>> Emil,
>> Here u ignore the IXGBE_VF_RX_QUEUES value returned the PF (stored in 
>> the hw->mac.max_rx_queues). This will accidentally work if PF is 
>> driven by a current ixgbe Linux driver but what would happen if HV is 
>> not a Linux box? What if HV decides to configure the PSRTYPE[x].RQPL 
>> to 0 and decide that VF should be configured with a single queue? I 
>> maybe miss something here but the above line seems bogus. Please, 
>> comment.
>
> It isn't ignored.  The fact that num_tcs is being tested for checks 
> for the one case where the number of RSS queues available would be 1, 
> otherwise the hardware will provide at least 2 queues. 

> If the RETA is not configured for 2 queues one of them will not be 
> active, but that should not be any sort of actual issue and would be 
> more of an administrative choice anyway as it would also limit the PF.

This would be an administrative choice ignored by the ixgbevf driver.
Frankly, I don't understand why are we arguing about this for so long? 
It's obvious that the safest and the most correct way to write it would 
be to limit the num_rx_queues by the value returned by PF. It would also 
remove any further questions and it's a one line patch.
However, if u still insist to keep it the way it is then let's drop this 
discussion and move on.

>
> - Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-25 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-05  9:35 [net-next 00/16][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2015-02-05 Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 01/16] fm10k: Validate VLAN ID in fm10k_update_xc_addr_pf Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 02/16] fm10k: Resolve compile warnings with W=1 Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 03/16] ixgbe: cleanup sparse errors in new ixgbe_x550.c file Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:48   ` David Laight
2015-02-05 22:40     ` David Miller
2015-02-05 23:19       ` Skidmore, Donald C
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 04/16] ixgbe: allow multiple queues in SRIOV mode Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 05/16] ixgbevf: enable multiple queue support Jeff Kirsher
2015-03-25  8:44   ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-25 14:32     ` Tantilov, Emil S
2015-03-25 16:27       ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-03-25 18:30     ` Alexander Duyck
2015-03-25 19:49       ` Vlad Zolotarov [this message]
2015-03-25 20:16         ` Alexander Duyck
2015-03-25 20:35           ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 06/16] ixgbevf: add RSS support for X550 Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 07/16] ixgbe: fix setting port VLAN Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 08/16] ixgbe: cleanup redundant default method set_rxpba Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 09/16] ixgbe: Cleanup probe to remove redundant attempt to ID PHY Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 10/16] ixgbe: add VXLAN offload support for X550 devices Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 11/16] ixgbevf: set vlan_features in a single write instead of several ORs Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 12/16] ixgbevf: Fix ordering of shutdown to correctly disable Rx and Tx Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 13/16] ixgbevf: Add code to check for Tx hang Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 14/16] ixgbevf: rewrite watchdog task to function similar to igbvf Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 15/16] ixgbevf: combine all of the tasks into a single service task Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-05  9:35 ` [net-next 16/16] ixgbe: add Tx anti spoofing support Jeff Kirsher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55131153.2090401@cloudius-systems.com \
    --to=vladz@cloudius-systems$(echo .)com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jogreene@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sassmann@redhat$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox