Subject: Re: [patch net-next] tc: introduce OpenFlow classifier

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:45:02 -0400

On 03/27/15 08:49, Thomas Graf wrote:

> So at that point you get fairly close to cls_flow in terms
> of functionality. Not sure why you want to keep them separate.
>

IMO, it is different enough to be separate.
Flow could do more of course (as could u32) but the lookup
approaches are different. And yes, ONF will probably make a press
release if you called it the openflow classifier (fingers crossed).

cheers,
jamal