Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters

From: Oliver Hartkopp <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:29:14 +0200

On 30.03.2015 11:50, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

>>   	can_err_mask_t err_mask;
>> +	struct sk_buff __percpu **uniq_skb;
>> +	ktime_t __percpu *uniq_tstamp;
>
> What about creating a struct to hold the ktime_t and the skb? BTW: the
> pointer to the skb can be marked as const.

Don't think so.

The pointer points to some allocated memory.

Regards,
Oliver