Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle_ing update

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 00:33:29 +0200

On 05/12/2015 12:03 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
...
> BTW, it should be protected by CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS
> rather than CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT.

Sure, I agree, this can further be improved. Feel free to send a patch.

>> I also am confident that the cost for non-users is equivalent before
>> and after this patch series.  Or at least, it very much should be.
>
> If people really cared about ingress qdisc, that spinlock should have
> gone much earlier than in 4.x release, rather than waiting for me to
> remind.

Thanks for your reminder then. ;)

Cheers,
Daniel