Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] test_bpf: add similarly conflicting jump test case only for classic

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 20:33:42 +0200

On 05/26/2015 07:45 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> While 3b52960266a3 ("test_bpf: add more eBPF jump torture cases")
> added the int3 bug test case only for eBPF, which needs exactly 11
> passes to converge, here's a version for classic BPF that would
...

Noticed a newline accidentally slipped in, please ignore this patch,
will fix it.