public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind•com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks•com>, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Cc: shm@cumulusnetworks•com, roopa@cumulusnetworks•com,
	gospo@cumulusnetworks•com, jtoppins@cumulusnetworks•com,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks•com, ddutt@cumulusnetworks•com,
	hannes@stressinduktion•org, stephen@networkplumber•org,
	hadi@mojatatu•com, ebiederm@xmission•com, davem@davemloft•net
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/6] Proposal for VRF-lite - v2
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:40:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559AA187.6000007@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436195001-4818-1-git-send-email-dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>

Le 06/07/2015 17:03, David Ahern a écrit :
> In the context of internet scale routing a requirement that always
> comes up is the need to partition the available routing tables into
> disjoint routing planes. A specific use case is the multi-tenancy
> problem where each tenant has their own unique routing tables and in
> the very least need different default gateways.
>
> This is an attempt to build the ability to create virtual router
> domains aka VRF's (VRF-lite to be specific) in the linux packet
> forwarding stack. The main observation is that through the use of
> rules and socket binding to interfaces, all the facilities that we
> need are already present in the infrastructure. What is missing is a
> handle that identifies a routing domain and can be used to gather
> applicable rules/tables and uniqify neighbor selection. The scheme
> used needs to preserves the notions of ECMP, and general routing
> principles.
[snip]
>   drivers/net/vrf.c             | 486 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[snip]

I'm still opposed to name this 'vrf', see the v1 thread:
  - http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg332357.html
  - http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg332376.html

Shrijeet seemed to agree to rename it, is there a problem?


Regards,
Nicolas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-06 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-06 15:03 [RFC net-next 0/6] Proposal for VRF-lite - v2 David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:03 ` [RFC net-next 1/6] fib: export symbols David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:03 ` [RFC net-next 2/6] net: Preparation for vrf device David Ahern
2015-07-08  8:37   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-07-08  8:40     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-07-08 16:10     ` David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:03 ` [RFC net-next 3/6] net: Introduce VRF device driver - v2 David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:42   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-07-06 16:37   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-07-06 16:46     ` David Ahern
2015-07-08  9:27   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-07-08 16:38     ` David Ahern
2015-07-08 18:34   ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-09 17:19     ` David Ahern
2015-07-09 17:28       ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-10  1:36         ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-07-10  2:12           ` David Ahern
2015-07-10  3:55             ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-07-10  4:20               ` David Ahern
2015-07-10  4:56                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-07-10 18:42                   ` David Ahern
2015-07-10  2:39         ` David Ahern
2015-07-10  3:28           ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-10  3:44             ` David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:03 ` [RFC net-next 4/6] net: Modifications to ipv4 stack for VRF devices David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:03 ` [RFC net-next 5/6] net: Add sk_bind_dev_if to task_struct David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:03 ` [RFC net-next 6/6] net: Add chvrf command David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH] iproute2: Add support for VRF device David Ahern
2015-07-06 15:40 ` Nicolas Dichtel [this message]
2015-07-06 17:53   ` [RFC net-next 0/6] Proposal for VRF-lite - v2 Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-07-08  9:30     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-07-10  5:14 ` Scott Feldman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559AA187.6000007@6wind.com \
    --to=nicolas.dichtel@6wind$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=ddutt@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission$(echo .)com \
    --cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hadi@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion$(echo .)org \
    --cc=jtoppins@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=shm@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox