Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sched: consolidate tc_classify{,_compat}

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:02:30 +0200

On 08/26/2015 11:54 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 8/26/15 2:00 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
...
>> +reset:
>> +    if (unlikely(limit++ >= MAX_REC_LOOP)) {
>> +        net_notice_ratelimited("%s: reclassify loop, rule prio %u, "
>> +                       "protocol %02x\n", tp->q->ops->id,
>> +                       tp->prio & 0xffff, ntohs(tp->protocol));
>
> why drop 'packet' and add two extra ',' in the message ?
> Not a big deal, just why bother?

No deep underlying reason, thought it would make it slightly
more readable.