public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded•com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb•org>, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] af_unix: return data from multiple SKBs on recv() with MSG_PEEK flag
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 20:23:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FD9A0E.1090804@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tvbb7zpbf.fsf@aconole.bos.csb>

Hello.

On 9/18/2015 7:04 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:

> AF_UNIX sockets now return multiple skbs from recv() when MSG_PEEK flag
> is set.
>
> This is referenced in kernel bugzilla #12323 @
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12323
>
> As described both in the BZ and lkml thread @
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/8/444 calling recv() with MSG_PEEK on an
> AF_UNIX socket only reads a single skb, where the desired effect is
> to return as much skb data has been queued, until hitting the recv
> buffer size (whichever comes first).
>
> The modified MSG_PEEK path will now move to the next skb in the tree
> and jump to the again: label, rather than following the natural loop
> structure. This requires duplicating some of the loop head actions.
>
> This was tested using the python socketpair() code attached to the
> bugzilla issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb•org>

    Your patch doesn't comply to the Linux CodingStyle.

> ---
>   net/unix/af_unix.c | 17+-
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index 03ee4d3..d2fd342 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -2179,9 +2181,22 @@ unlock:
>   			if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
>   				scm.fp = scm_fp_dup(UNIXCB(skb).fp);
>
> -			sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
> +			if (skip)
> +			{

			if (skip) {

> +				sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
> +				skip -= chunk;
> +			}
>
> -			break;
> +			if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
> +				break;
> +
> +			/* XXX - this is ugly; better would be rewrite the function  */
> +			last = skb;
> +			last_len = skb->len;
> +			unix_state_lock(&sk);
> +			skb = skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> +			if (skb) goto again;

			if (skb)
				goto again;

> +			goto unlock;
>   		}
>   	} while (size);
>

MBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-19 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-18 16:04 [PATCH net] af_unix: return data from multiple SKBs on recv() with MSG_PEEK flag Aaron Conole
2015-09-19 17:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2015-09-20  1:55   ` Aaron Conole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55FD9A0E.1090804@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded$(echo .)com \
    --cc=aconole@bytheb$(echo .)org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox