public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox•net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid•com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital•net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion•org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google•com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium•org>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: fix cb access in socket filter programs
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:39:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5614E84E.2010806@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444184292-17500-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com>

On 10/07/2015 04:18 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> eBPF socket filter programs may see junk in 'u32 cb[5]' area,
> since it could have been used by protocol layers earlier.
>
> On the receive path the af_packet sees clean skb->cb.
> On the xmit the dev_queue_xmit_nit() delivers cloned skb, so we can
> conditionally clean 20 bytes of skb->cb that could be used by the program.

Having slept over this one night, I think this assumption is not
always correct :/, more below ...

> For programs attached to TCP/UDP sockets we need to save/restore
> these 20 bytes, since it's used by protocol layers.
...
> +static inline u32 bpf_prog_run_save_cb(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> +				       struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	u8 *cb_data = qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->data;
> +	u8 saved_cb[QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN];
> +	u32 res;
> +
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct __sk_buff, cb) !=
> +		     QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(prog->cb_access)) {
> +		memcpy(saved_cb, cb_data, sizeof(saved_cb));
> +		memset(cb_data, 0, sizeof(saved_cb));
> +	}
> +
> +	res = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, skb);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(prog->cb_access))
> +		memcpy(cb_data, saved_cb, sizeof(saved_cb));
> +
> +	return res;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 bpf_prog_run_clear_cb(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> +					struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	u8 *cb_data = qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->data;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(prog->cb_access) && skb->pkt_type == PACKET_OUTGOING)
> +		memset(cb_data, 0, QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN);
> +	return BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, skb);
> +}
> +
>   static inline unsigned int bpf_prog_size(unsigned int proglen)
>   {
>   	return max(sizeof(struct bpf_prog),

bpf_prog_run_clear_cb() wouldn't work on dev_forward_skb() as
skb->pkt_type is then being scrubbed to PACKET_HOST, so on the
receive path, AF_PACKET might not always see clean skbs->cb[]
as assumed ... I think that the skb->pkt_type part needs to be
dropped, no?

Thanks,
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-07  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-07  2:18 [PATCH net-next] bpf: fix cb access in socket filter programs Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-07  9:39 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-10-07 13:09   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-10-07 16:53     ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5614E84E.2010806@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion$(echo .)org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium$(echo .)org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital$(echo .)net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox