Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

From: David Ahern <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:02:47 -0600

On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>
> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses.
> This is one example with a team device:

for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses.