Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

From: David Ahern <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:14:14 -0600

On 10/16/15 10:12 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, David Ahern <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses.
>>> This is one example with a team device:
>>
>>
>> for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses.
>>
>
> That is interesting. As far I can see you are setting IFF_SLAVE in
> do_vrf_add_slave() and therefore already stop IPv6 addrconf.
>

Check net-next. That had to be removed to get IPv6 working.