Subject: Re: memory leak in do_ipv6_setsockopt

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:24:13 +0100

On 12/01/2015 03:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 15:07 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
>> Yeah, we miss inet6_destroy_sock() in SCTP. :-(
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>
> OK, I will send a formal (and tested ;) ) patch.

I was shortly wondering whether there could be a use-after-free by
doing this after sctp_destroy_sock() due to the sctp_endpoint_destroy()
that would eventually drop a ref on the socket, but the endpoint holds
a separate ref, so we should be good.

Thanks,
Daniel