From: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks•com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4•com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission•com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Inverse of flowi{4,6}_oif: flowi{4,6}_not_oif
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:28:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B22A95.4010408@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9pGKeM9=qqcxrN12ELtTjhwgBkPV0K3ixfVz3a_CBugAw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/3/16 7:27 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> FYI, for v4 at least, it's ridiculously easy and simple to implement:
>
> =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
>
> diff --git a/include/net/flow.h b/include/net/flow.h
> index 83969ee..29967ad 100644
> --- a/include/net/flow.h
> +++ b/include/net/flow.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct flowi_tunnel {
>
> struct flowi_common {
> int flowic_oif;
> + int flowic_not_oif;
> int flowic_iif;
> __u32 flowic_mark;
> __u8 flowic_tos;
I was going to suggest a flag:
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct flowi_common {
#define FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH 0x02
#define FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_SRC 0x04
#define FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF 0x08
+#define FLOWI_FLAG_NOT_OIF 0x10
__u32 flowic_secid;
struct flowi_tunnel flowic_tun_key;
};
but there are a number of oif checks that would have to be enhanced with
the flag check. Adding a flowic_not_oif member is certainly simpler and
there is a 4-byte hole in the struct.
> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ union flowi_uli {
> struct flowi4 {
> struct flowi_common __fl_common;
> #define flowi4_oif __fl_common.flowic_oif
> +#define flowi4_not_oif __fl_common.flowic_not_oif
> #define flowi4_iif __fl_common.flowic_iif
> #define flowi4_mark __fl_common.flowic_mark
> #define flowi4_tos __fl_common.flowic_tos
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> index 7aea0cc..d03e991 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> @@ -1429,6 +1429,8 @@ found:
> flp->flowi4_oif != nh->nh_oif)
> continue;
> }
> + if (flp->flowi4_not_oif && flp->flowi4_not_oif == nh->nh_oif)
> + continue;
>
> if (!(fib_flags & FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF))
> atomic_inc(&fi->fib_clntref);
>
For IPv6 start with ip6_pol_route_lookup and modifying rt6_device_match
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-03 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 22:42 [RFC] Inverse of flowi{4,6}_oif: flowi{4,6}_not_oif Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-02-03 14:27 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-02-03 16:28 ` David Ahern [this message]
2016-02-03 17:40 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-02-03 17:46 ` [PATCH] flowi: add concept of "not_oif" Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-02-03 20:42 ` Julian Anastasov
2016-02-03 21:02 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-02-04 3:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-02-05 18:38 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B22A95.4010408@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=dsa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox