Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtlwifi: Fix reusable codes in core.c

From: Larry Finger <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 13:46:56 -0600

On 02/02/2016 08:16 PM, Byeoungwook Kim wrote:
> rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
> So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byeoungwook Kim <[email-masked]>
> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <[email-masked]>
> ---
> V2 split in separate patchs.
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c | 28 ++++------------------------
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
> index 05f432c..c1193d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
> @@ -63,18 +63,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtl_addr_delay);
>   void rtl_rfreg_delay(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path rfpath, u32 addr,
>   		     u32 mask, u32 data)
>   {
> -	if (addr == 0xfe) {
> -		mdelay(50);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xfd) {
> -		mdelay(5);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xfc) {
> -		mdelay(1);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xfb) {
> -		udelay(50);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xfa) {
> -		udelay(5);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xf9) {
> -		udelay(1);
> +	if (addr >= 0xf9 && addr <= 0xfe) {
> +		rtl_addr_delay(addr);
>   	} else {
>   		rtl_set_rfreg(hw, rfpath, addr, mask, data);
>   		udelay(1);
> @@ -84,18 +74,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtl_rfreg_delay);
>
>   void rtl_bb_delay(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 addr, u32 data)
>   {
> -	if (addr == 0xfe) {
> -		mdelay(50);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xfd) {
> -		mdelay(5);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xfc) {
> -		mdelay(1);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xfb) {
> -		udelay(50);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xfa) {
> -		udelay(5);
> -	} else if (addr == 0xf9) {
> -		udelay(1);
> +	if (addr >= 0xf9 && addr <= 0xfe) {
> +		rtl_addr_delay(addr);
>   	} else {
>   		rtl_set_bbreg(hw, addr, MASKDWORD, data);
>   		udelay(1);
>

Unlike patch 1 of 2, this one makes changes that are good. Thus

Acked-by: Larry Finger <[email-masked]>

Thanks,

Larry