public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat•com>
To: Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@broadcom•com>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org,
	Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom•com>,
	Padmanabh Ratnakar <padmanabh.ratnakar@broadcom•com>,
	Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom•com>,
	Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] be2net: don't report EVB for older chipsets when SR-IOV is disabled
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:38:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BC72A7.3040100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKvpyk1u=59YZLoX9kTpTFm0=bXdyE-LaZpCobZwmWo+wa5RTg@mail.gmail.com>

On 11.2.2016 10:56, Sathya Perla wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat•com> wrote:
>>
>> The EVB (virtual bridge) functionality should be disabled on older BE3
>> and Lancer chips if SR-IOV is disabled in the NIC's BIOS. This setting
>> is identified by the zero value of total VFs reported by the card.
>> The GET_HSW_CONFIG command cannot be used as it is not supported > by these older chipset's FW.
>>
> ..
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
>> index 9c1fc9d..886fe95 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
>> @@ -4588,6 +4588,8 @@ static int be_ndo_bridge_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq,
>>
>>          /* BE and Lancer chips support VEB mode only */
>>          if (BEx_chip(adapter) || lancer_chip(adapter)) {
>> +               if (!pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(adapter->pdev))
>> +                       return 0;
>
> Ivan, could you add a one line comment above this check that says "On
> BE3/Lancer the VEB is disabled in non-SRIOV profiles". This is to
> differentiate this behavior from Skyhawk, where the VEB may be enabled
> even in non-SRIOV profiles, like nPAR...
>
> thanks,
> -Sathya
>
Sure Sathya, will send v2.

Ivan

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-11 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-10 12:13 [PATCH net-next] be2net: don't report EVB for older chipsets when SR-IOV is disabled Ivan Vecera
2016-02-11  9:56 ` Sathya Perla
2016-02-11 11:38   ` Ivan Vecera [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56BC72A7.3040100@redhat.com \
    --to=ivecera@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=padmanabh.ratnakar@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sathya.perla@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox