Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/5] introduce IFE action

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:52:06 -0500

On 16-02-23 11:12 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 02/23/2016 03:39 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

>
> My question was rather: should the kernel enforce the IDs and only
> allow what the kernel dictates (and not in/out of tree modules)? If
> yes, then there would be no need for a module parameter (and the
> module param should be avoided in any case).
>

Maybe i should just take it out for now and assume whatever is
in the kernel are the only allowed metadata.

cheers,
jamal