public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: f6bvp <f6bvp@free•fr>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips•org
Subject: Re: [Patch] rose_route_frame() NULL pointer dereference kernel panic
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 21:37:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D5FD7A.5080104@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160225.170957.836114237953219422.davem@davemloft.net>

Hi David, Ralf,

David is absolutely right about my unappropriate patch.
Although I had searched functions calling rose_route_frame(), I did not
notice rose_xmit() was involved. Shame on me !

Then, David precisely located the source of the issue we are facing.

When rose_xmit() calls rose_route_frame() with NULL as second argument,
there is always a null pointer dereference when rose_route_frame() calls 
ax25cmp().

Here is the explanation :

When rose_route_frame() is called by rose_xmit() with NULL *ax25 argument
the following comparison (rose_route.c , line 883)

if (ax25cmp(&ax25->dest_addr, &rose_neigh->callsign) == 0 &&

always has a pointer dereference leading to a kernel panic.

I noticed, using a few printk, that during rose normal operations 
rose_xmit() was never called
when ax25ipd sends an UDP frame. Otherwise, this bug would have been 
found earlier.
It is only because FPAC application asked for a connection to an address 
without defined route and
gateway that rose_xmit() was activated.

I am not sure I understood well the purpose of the NULL second argument.
I only guess it was intended to have ax25->dest_addr empty in order to 
make the comparison
with all possible rose_neigh->callsign always false.

I built the following patch in order to obtain the same result without 
NULL pointer.

--- a/net/rose/rose_dev.c       2016-02-25 21:01:36.000000000 +0100
+++ b/net/rose/rose_dev.c  2016-03-01 14:08:29.911389078 +0100
@@ -101,13 +101,16 @@ static netdev_tx_t rose_xmit(struct sk_b
  {
         struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
         unsigned int len = skb->len;
+       struct ax25_cb ax25;

+       memset(&ax25, 0, sizeof(struct ax25_cb));
+
         if (!netif_running(dev)) {
                 printk(KERN_ERR "ROSE: rose_xmit - called when iface is 
down\n");
                 return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
         }

-       if (!rose_route_frame(skb, NULL)) {
+       if (!rose_route_frame(skb, &ax25)) {
                 dev_kfree_skb(skb);
                 stats->tx_errors++;
                 return NETDEV_TX_OK;

Could Ralf or David please check if above code syntax is correct.
I tested the patch and found rose was working correctly with no more 
panic nor
unwanted effects on rose_route_frame() normal operations.

Bernard Pidoux

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-01 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-24 16:53 [Patch] rose_route_frame() NULL pointer dereference kernel panic f6bvp
2016-02-25 22:09 ` David Miller
2016-03-01 20:37   ` f6bvp [this message]
2016-03-03 22:02     ` David Miller
2016-03-05 15:32       ` f6bvp
2016-03-05 16:22         ` David Miller
2016-03-05 17:32           ` f6bvp
2016-03-05 19:57             ` Francois Romieu
     [not found]               ` <56DC0B8A.5030708@free.fr>
2016-03-06 10:58                 ` f6bvp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D5FD7A.5080104@free.fr \
    --to=f6bvp@free$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox