Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] infiniband: hns: add Hisilicon RoCE support(driver code)

From: oulijun <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:49:32 +0800

Hi Parav Pandit, thanks your reviewing.
On 2016/3/4 17:37, Parav Pandit wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Wei Hu(Xavier) <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> +
>> +int hns_roce_register_device(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
>> +{
>> +       int ret;
>> +       struct hns_roce_ib_iboe *iboe = NULL;
>> +       struct ib_device *ib_dev = NULL;
>> +       struct device *dev = &hr_dev->pdev->dev;
>> +
>> +       iboe = &hr_dev->iboe;
>> +
>> +       ib_dev = &hr_dev->ib_dev;
>> +       strlcpy(ib_dev->name, "hisi_%d", IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX);
>> +
>> +       ib_dev->owner                   = THIS_MODULE;
>> +       ib_dev->node_type               = RDMA_NODE_IB_CA;
>> +       ib_dev->dma_device              = dev;
>> +
>> +       ib_dev->phys_port_cnt           = hr_dev->caps.num_ports;
>> +       ib_dev->local_dma_lkey          = hr_dev->caps.reserved_lkey;
>> +       ib_dev->num_comp_vectors        = hr_dev->caps.num_comp_vectors;
>> +       ib_dev->uverbs_abi_ver          = 1;
>> +       ib_dev->uverbs_cmd_mask         =
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_GET_CONTEXT) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_QUERY_DEVICE) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_QUERY_PORT) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_ALLOC_PD) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_DEALLOC_PD) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_REG_MR) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_DEREG_MR) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_CREATE_COMP_CHANNEL) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_CREATE_CQ) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_DESTROY_CQ) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_CREATE_QP) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_MODIFY_QP) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_QUERY_QP) |
>> +               (1ULL << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_DESTROY_QP);
>> +
> 
> Since SRQ is not supported in this driver version, can you keep
> remaining code base also to not bother about SRQ specifically
> poll_cq_one, modify_qp, destroy_qp etc?
> SRQ support can come as complete additional patch along with cmd_mask,
> callbacks and rest of the code.
> 
> .
Sorry, I see your review in time.
Sure, SRQ is not supported in current roce driver. I have verified the function
for RDMA. It is not influence. For your question, we need to analyse it scientific.
after that, i will reply your doubt, is that ok?

thanks
Lijun Ou