Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] tcp: various missing rcu_read_lock around __sk_dst_get

From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 02:30:59 +0200

On 01.04.2016 02:12, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Since this function does not take a reference on the dst, how could it
> be safe ?
>
> As soon as you exit the function, dst would possibly point to something
> obsolete/freed.
>
> This works because the caller owns the socket.
>
> If you believe one path needs to be fixed, tell me which one it is.
>
> Please ?

I fixed this one, I wait with review a bit and collapse some of the 
newer fixes into one and check and repost again tomorrow.

Thanks for reviewing!

Bye,
Hannes