From: Yuki Machida <machida.yuki@jp•fujitsu.com>
To: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu•net>
Cc: hannes@stressinduktion•org, rongqing.li@windriver•com,
netdev@vger•kernel.org, davem@davemloft•net
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Section 4 No. 9,10 Failed was occurred by IPv6 Ready Logo Conformance Test
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:45:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5715F02F.2010609@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <293867211.2746.1460728775752@office.mailbox.org>
Hi Hagen,
On 2016年04月15日 22:59, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
>> On April 15, 2016 at 10:47 AM Yuki Machida <machida.yuki@jp•fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> commit 9d289715eb5c252ae15bd547cb252ca547a3c4f2
>>>> Author: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu•net>
>>>> Date: Thu Jan 15 22:34:25 2015 +0100
>>>>
>>>> ipv6: stop sending PTB packets for MTU < 1280
>>>>
>>>> Reduce the attack vector and stop generating IPv6 Fragment Header for
>>>> paths with an MTU smaller than the minimum required IPv6 MTU
>>>> size (1280 byte) - called atomic fragments.
>>>>
>>>> See IETF I-D "Deprecating the Generation of IPv6 Atomic Fragments" [1]
>>>> for more information and how this "feature" can be misused.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-00
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks•com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu•net>
>>>> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion•org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
>>>
>>> I will try.
>>
>> I confirmed that v4.1.20 revert above patch is passed Section 4 No. 9 and 10 testcases
>> in IPv6 Ready Logo Conformance Test.
>> I can't immediately revert above patch from v4.6-rc1 by implementation has changed.
>
> is it to please a conforming test tool or fix "revert 9d289715eb5c2" a real problem? If so: which problem do you have with 9d289715eb5c2 or draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-06?
Thank you for your reply.
I was wrong.
That real problem may not be 9d289715eb5c2,
Because Roy said "TAHI should be updated".
But I don't understand that real problem is in Test Tool or draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-06.
I am conforming it.
Regards,
Yuki Machida
>
> Hagen
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-19 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-01 7:31 Section 4 No. 9,10 Failed was occurred by IPv6 Ready Logo Conformance Test Yuki Machida
2016-04-01 7:43 ` Rongqing Li
2016-04-01 8:00 ` Yuki Machida
2016-04-04 6:43 ` Yuki Machida
2016-04-15 8:47 ` Fwd: " Yuki Machida
2016-04-15 13:59 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2016-04-19 8:45 ` Yuki Machida [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5715F02F.2010609@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=machida.yuki@jp$(echo .)fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=hagen@jauu$(echo .)net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion$(echo .)org \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=rongqing.li@windriver$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox