Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] e1000e: e1000e_cyclecounter_read(): incvalue is 32 bits, not 64

From: Denys Vlasenko <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:43:05 +0200

On 04/19/2016 10:57 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> "incvalue" variable holds a result of "er32(TIMINCA) &
>> E1000_TIMINCA_INCVALUE_MASK"
>> and used in "do_div(temp, incvalue)" as a divisor.
>>
>> Thus, "u64 incvalue" declaration is probably a mistake.
>> Even though it seems to be a harmless one, let's fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <[email-masked]>
>> CC: Jeff Kirsher <[email-masked]>
>> CC: Jesse Brandeburg <[email-masked]>
>> CC: Shannon Nelson <[email-masked]>
>> CC: Carolyn Wyborny <[email-masked]>
>> CC: Don Skidmore <[email-masked]>
>> CC: Bruce Allan <[email-masked]>
>> CC: John Ronciak <[email-masked]>
>> CC: Mitch Williams <[email-masked]>
>> CC: David S. Miller <[email-masked]>
>> CC: LKML <[email-masked]>
>> CC: [email-masked]
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> First of all, trimmed down the recipient list since almost all of the
> reviewers you added have nothing to do with e1000e.

I took the list here, MAINTAINERS:

INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS
M:      Jeff Kirsher <[email-masked]>
R:      Jesse Brandeburg <[email-masked]>
R:      Shannon Nelson <[email-masked]>
R:      Carolyn Wyborny <[email-masked]>
R:      Don Skidmore <[email-masked]>
R:      Bruce Allan <[email-masked]>
R:      John Ronciak <[email-masked]>
R:      Mitch Williams <[email-masked]>

No more specific information who's e1000e reviewer.
Sorry.