Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libxt_hashlimit: Prepare libxt_hashlimit.c for revision 2

From: Vishwanath Pai <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:54:39 -0400

On 07/08/2016 12:37 PM, David Laight wrote:
> If you think some users would still want 32bit limits, then you should
> (probably) use a _64 suffix for the new functions.
> 
> 	David

I am proposing a new revision for hashlimit that supports a higher rate
along with a few other changes/fixes (in separate patches). Hence the
prefix _v2 for the new functions.

- Vish