Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libxt_hashlimit: Prepare libxt_hashlimit.c for revision 2

From: Vishwanath Pai <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:02:57 -0400

On 07/08/2016 12:54 PM, Vishwanath Pai wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 12:37 PM, David Laight wrote:
>> If you think some users would still want 32bit limits, then you should
>> (probably) use a _64 suffix for the new functions.
>>
>> 	David
> 
> I am proposing a new revision for hashlimit that supports a higher rate
> along with a few other changes/fixes (in separate patches). Hence the
> prefix _v2 for the new functions.
> 
> - Vish
> 

I'm sorry _v1 for the old functions, the new functions (for rev2) don't
have a suffix.