Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf, test_verifier: fix a test case error result on unprivileged

From: Alexei Starovoitov <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:43:50 -0800

On 12/14/16 4:39 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Running ./test_verifier as unprivileged lets 1 out of 98 tests fail:
>
>    [...]
>    #71 unpriv: check that printk is disallowed FAIL
>    Unexpected error message!
>    0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
>    1: (bf) r1 = r10
>    2: (07) r1 += -8
>    3: (b7) r2 = 8
>    4: (bf) r3 = r1
>    5: (85) call bpf_trace_printk#6
>    unknown func bpf_trace_printk#6
>    [...]
>
> The test case is correct, just that the error outcome changed with
> ebb676daa1a3 ("bpf: Print function name in addition to function id").
> Same as with e00c7b216f34 ("bpf: fix multiple issues in selftest suite
> and samples") issue 2), so just fix up the function name.
>
> Fixes: ebb676daa1a3 ("bpf: Print function name in addition to function id")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>

was thinking to send the same fix. Thanks you for beating me :)
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email-masked]>