From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox•net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: ast@fb•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf: adjust verifier heuristics
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 12:34:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <591D78D2.6080004@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517.225637.2083628580374404255.davem@davemloft.net>
On 05/18/2017 04:56 AM, David Miller wrote:
[...]
> Ok, applied, but we should continue trying to make the pruner
> more effective.
Yeah, agree, I was planning to look into states_equal() for
the current alignment tracking we do and what we can optimize
resp. what needs to be fixed there on pruning side for -net
tree with regards to my prior mail on that. If you haven't
started, I could look into this next Monday at latest.
Thanks,
Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-18 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-18 1:00 [PATCH net] bpf: adjust verifier heuristics Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-18 2:56 ` David Miller
2017-05-18 10:34 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=591D78D2.6080004@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
--cc=ast@fb$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox