public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox•net>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat•com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox•net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail•com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel•com>, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 1/5] samples/bpf: xdp_tx_iptunnel make use of map_data[]
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 17:45:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <591F1315.3010304@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149512209298.14733.14668513619424960672.stgit@firesoul>

On 05/18/2017 05:41 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> There is no reason to use a compile time constant MAX_IPTNL_ENTRIES
> shared between the _user.c and _kern.c, when map_data[].def.max_entries
> can tell us dynamically what the max_entries were of the ELF map that
> the bpf loaded created.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat•com>

Previous code was perhaps a bit more robust in the sense that the
order of the map wouldn't matter due to MAX_IPTNL_ENTRIES being
shared. Now you rely on it being in slot 1 (map_data[1].def.max_entries)
from "maps" section in ELF.

>   samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_common.h |    2 --
>   samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_kern.c   |    2 +-
>   samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_user.c   |   14 +++++++++-----
>   3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Not sure it's worth it given this actually adds more code and makes
it more fragile at the same time. Only point I could see is to demo
usage of map_data[1].def.max_entries for sample code.

Perhaps at the very minimum add a warning comment to xdp_tx_iptunnel_kern.c
that should the code be further extended with additional maps, that
ordering of struct bpf_map_def entries really matters here to not break
the _user.c part.

Other than that, this should be sent as stand-alone "cleanup" ...

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-19 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-18 15:41 [RFC net-next PATCH 0/5] XDP driver feature API and handling change to xdp_buff Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-18 15:41 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 1/5] samples/bpf: xdp_tx_iptunnel make use of map_data[] Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-19 15:45   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-05-18 15:41 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 2/5] mlx5: fix bug reading rss_hash_type from CQE Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-19 15:47   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-19 23:38   ` David Miller
2017-05-22 18:27     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-18 15:41 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 3/5] net: introduce XDP driver features interface Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-19 17:13   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-19 23:37     ` David Miller
2017-05-20  7:53     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-21  0:58       ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-22 14:49         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-22 17:07           ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-30  9:58             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-18 15:41 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 4/5] net: new XDP feature for reading HW rxhash from drivers Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-19 11:47   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-20  3:07   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-20  3:21     ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-05-20  3:34       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-20  4:13         ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-05-21 15:55     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-22  3:21       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-22  4:12         ` John Fastabend
2017-05-20 16:16   ` Tom Herbert
2017-05-21 16:04     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-21 22:10       ` Tom Herbert
2017-05-22  6:39         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-22 20:42           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-05-22 21:32             ` Tom Herbert
2017-05-18 15:41 ` [RFC net-next PATCH 5/5] mlx5: add XDP rxhash feature for driver mlx5 Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=591F1315.3010304@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=brouer@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox