public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox•net>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl•cc>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber•org>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH] lib/bpf: Fix bytecode-file parsing
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 21:13:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59A9B15C.3060404@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170830141155.GH20614@orbyte.nwl.cc>

On 08/30/2017 04:11 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:53:59PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 08/29/2017 05:09 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
[...]
>>
>> I don't really have a strong opinion on this, but the logic for
>> normalizing here is getting a bit convoluted. Is your use case
>> for making the parser more robust mainly so you can just use the
>> -ddd output from tcpdump for cBPF w/o piping through tr? But even
>> that shouldn't give multiple empty lines afaik, no?
>
> Well, using tcpdump output was functional before already. I just noticed
> that if I add an empty line to the end of bytecode-file, it will fail
> and I didn't like that. Then while searching for the EOF issue, I
> noticed that the parser logic above is a bit faulty in that it will
> treat different characters equally but doesn't make sure c_prev will be
> assigned only one of them. So apart from the added robustness, it really
> fixes an inconsistency in the parsing logic.

Ok, fine by me.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-01 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-29 15:09 [iproute PATCH] lib/bpf: Fix bytecode-file parsing Phil Sutter
2017-08-30 13:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-30 14:11   ` Phil Sutter
2017-09-01 19:13     ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-09-04 19:09 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59A9B15C.3060404@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl$(echo .)cc \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox