Subject: Re: Kernel panic in eth_header

From: Eric Dumazet <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:28:42 -0800

On 02/05/2019 12:21 PM, Andrew wrote:

> I think that backport will be trivial - at least patch lays smoothly on 4.9 (just with offsets difference).
> 
> I'll test it.
> 
> Btw, maybe there's a some test conditions to quickly check if patch helps? Crash is reproducible with unpredictable interval (tens of hours of quite heavy load).
>

Build your kernel with CONFIG_KASAN=y

Then run the tests Peter wrote.

4c3510483d26420d2c2c7cc075ad872286cc5932 selftests: net: ip_defrag: cover new IPv6 defrag behavior
3271a4821882a64214acc1bd7b173900ec70c9bf selftests: net: fix/improve ip_defrag selftest
bccc17118bcf3c62c947361d51760334f6602f43 selftests/net: add ipv6 tests to ip_defrag selftest
02c7f38b7ace9f1b2ddb7a88139127eef4cf8706 selftests/net: add ip_defrag selftest