From: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia•com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>
Cc: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia•com>,
Mohsin Bashir <mohsin.bashr@gmail•com>, <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
<shuah@kernel•org>, <davem@davemloft•net>, <edumazet@google•com>,
<pabeni@redhat•com>, <willemb@google•com>, <dw@davidwei•uk>,
<przemyslaw.kitszel@intel•com>, <linux-kselftest@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] selftests: net: py: support verbose printing, display executed commands
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:03:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874j7qm50y.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240809210342.244413c1@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org> writes:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 14:36:17 +0200 Petr Machata wrote:
>> > + env_level = env.get('VERBOSE')
>> > + set_verbosity(env_level)
>> > +
>>
>> Actually, the ksft_setup() here was merged last week, and I think that
>> would be a better place to put this stuff. It already handles
>> DISRUPTIVE, it should IMHO handle VERBOSE as well.
>
> I was wondering about that too, FWIW, but the counter argument is that
> VERBOSE has little to do with ksft. It doesn't even include the #
> prefix on the list it outputs by itself (unlike ksft_pr() which does).
>
> Maybe we do as you suggest but rename verbose() to ksft_dbg() and
> make it act more like ksft_pr()?
That would make sense to me.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-07 0:24 [PATCH net-next v2] selftests: net: py: support verbose printing, display executed commands Mohsin Bashir
2024-08-09 12:36 ` Petr Machata
2024-08-10 4:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-12 10:03 ` Petr Machata [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874j7qm50y.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=petrm@nvidia$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=dw@davidwei$(echo .)uk \
--cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mohsin.bashr@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=shuah@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=willemb@google$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox