Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] Add c/r support for connected INET sockets

From: Dan Smith <danms-r/[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:34:11 -0700

JD> Yep.  It sort of messes up your separation between layers, though.

In what way?  It's just this:

diff --git a/net/checkpoint.c b/net/checkpoint.c
index 3d6da68..f74ebe4 100644
--- a/net/checkpoint.c
+++ b/net/checkpoint.c
@@ -687,7 +687,8 @@ struct sock *do_sock_restore(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx)
        /* silently clear flags, e.g. SOCK_NONBLOCK or SOCK_CLOEXEC */
        h->sock.type &= SOCK_TYPE_MASK;
 
-       ret = sock_create(h->sock_common.family, h->sock.type, 0, &sock);
+       ret = sock_create(h->sock_common.family, h->sock.type,
+                         h->sock.protocol, &sock);
        if (ret < 0)
                goto err;

Which seems like a why-didn't-I-do-that-in-the-first-place sort of
thing...   Am I missing something?

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms-r/[email-masked]